About sovereignty
Determining the cause of a disease is usually a very complex process that involves an in-depth and controversial discussion before agreeing (!) what the current state of science is. At least it should be like that. With SARS-CoV2 it took a few weeks. It gives the impression that one has been waiting for a second SARS chance for years.
The mood in biomedicine is like this. Everything that seems dangerous to fatal drives research forward. And research is always good. Can you ever know that enough? However, instead of creating knowledge, it is often enough to only reach a somewhat contradictory consensus. That doesn't bother anyone as long as the research billions and profits flow.
It does not matter that healthy people also carry many different viruses, some with vital tasks (human virome). Nor does it matter that many types of virus and strains are not pathogenic. To differentiate, one simply assumes ultra-specific methods. Dr. Drosten, the SARS (co) discoverer, has benefited disproportionately from these circumstances in the past.
There are good scientific standards. And haste doesn't produce quality. Science, and thus politics, is now running after that. It is easier to discredit valid arguments than fake news.
(Source: https://www.wodarg.com/2020/03/31/suche-mit-pcr-nach-sars-cov2/)
No comments:
Post a Comment