by Wolfgang Wodarg, June 12, 2020
If you still want to give us a corona “vaccination”, you may know something about molecular biology, or about business, but look away when it comes to health.
And anyone who wants to convince us that our freedoms must be suppressed until there is a vaccination is probably a specialist in suppression, but not in prevention.
So that as many as possible can make informed decisions again without the panic pressure, it should be explained what the proposed measures are about, how they work and what risks they involve. Given the importance of this topic for us and future generations, political recommendations should not be left out.
Precautionary principle - was there something there?
What was scolded and protested when Monsanto & Co. genetically modified the seeds. The protest against genetically modified organisms, i.e. plants, animals and microorganisms, was an integral part of many party programs. Especially with the greens and greenish wings of other parties. There have been huge protests against the release of such GMOs, and everything from world hunger to bee death has been done to provide political resistance. (3)
About genes, viruses and hosts
The genome or genome [sic] is often represented with a double helix, through which the species-specific information is passed on and varied from generation to generation in many living things. Of course it's not that simple. Genes are summarized in a very abstract way, with the help of which our cellular identity is continuously reorganized and adapted in its environment.
Other viruses remain hidden in cells for a long time until they let their copies swarm out again. The argument about whether viruses are living organisms is idle and a question of perspective, because all living organisms (even humans), like viruses, cannot multiply without a suitable environment.
Every virus infection is actually a natural genetic change in the target cells. However, the difference to the planned genetic manipulation is huge, because an infection is associated with a virus multiplication and with a multi-layered defense reaction at the local, humoral and cellular level. Even the infected own cells are recognized and destroyed and cleared by the intact immune system by so-called killer cells.
We call these regulated defense reactions of our body inflammation. We feel them as symptoms and can therefore immediately support our body and our fellow human beings through our behavior in such a crisis. It is a natural and necessary discussion, an interaction regulated by complex communication processes.
The infection process has been perfected in our ancestors for millennia and is part of the common natural development of host and virus. (For immunological details, I recommend the easy-to-understand article by Professor Dr. Beda M. Stadler from Bern.)
Vaccine development was initially carried out by the state and solely from public funds.
For example, smallpox was eradicated and polio, tetanus and diphtheria were largely suppressed. However, there was a complete paradigm shift when vaccination was deregulated from a burden of public services to a business idea by pharmaceutical companies. For about two generations, the state has only been able to make sure that industry no longer does anything harmful to us. But even this is made more difficult by a greedy industry, whose primary interest is not health, but profit, due to corrupting influences on regulatory and health authorities and, increasingly, also on politics. And since the invention of "Pandemic Preparedness."
Virologists who are directly or indirectly dependent on the bio-tech industry have taken on the role of generating the fear of hostile pathogens at ever shorter intervals. In this "fight against viruses", the "war correspondents" help the companies with cooperating mainsteam media, which stir up the necessary fear and political pressure. They repeatedly create a public mood, under the influence of which our governments have been repeatedly blackmailed (or even encouraged?) to ignore all critical voices and to buy large quantities of the drugs or vaccines of the pandemic profiteers that were quickly cobbled together.
Of the approximately 100 “vaccines against Covid-19” currently being developed in competition, 12 are already in clinical trials. According to information from the WHO on June 9th, four of these contain recombinant RNA and three candidates DNA. Only a minority are conceived as a conventional vaccine. Seven of these twelve candidates therefore have nothing in common with vaccination, but are genetic engineering changes in humans that sail under the false flag. Therefore, "vaccination" is put in quotes.
These are fragments of different genetic information that are to be brought into human cells as RNA (4) or DNA (5) in likewise different ways (6).
Recombinant RNA, which is introduced into human cells, also changes the genetic processes there and can be classified as a genetic modification of the cells or the organism, because genetic modification is not limited to a direct change in DNA. However, the recombinant RNA introduced into the cells should not multiply as the viruses do. It is also not part of the practiced cellular communication and misuses existing defense routines such as private security services a police station.
That can be what should not be
Humans will therefore be genetically modified by the planned “vaccinations”, even if the legislature has excluded the use of this term for humans themselves when defining GMOs (1). This has been done to avoid human rights opposition, although equal interference in animals would lead to this label. People are already genetically modified in special cases. Such changes run as "gene therapy" (2) and are subject to high legal hurdles (e.g. Zolgensma).
Furthermore, there is always the risk of artificial genetic modifications that these could also include the germ cells. A germline change, i.e. inheritable genetic modifications have so far been taboo under human rights. The participants in the clinical testing of the new genetic "vaccines" must therefore also commit themselves to strict measures to prevent pregnancy.
In the case of the “gene vaccinations” imposed on us by scaremongering, a lobby also ensured in good time that the planned mass applications of recombinant genetic information in humans are not already called “gene therapy or gene prophylaxis” to improve acceptance, although they are natural.
In some of the planned or already ongoing clinical studies, the genetic processes of cell-internal communication are interfered with so that our body cells themselves produce new substances that were previously supplied by vaccines from outside. Our cells are to be reprogrammed into bioreactors for internal vaccine production.
Vaccines are no longer to be produced on chicken embryos or in technical bioreactors, but from our own body cells.
To do this, you have to genetically modify our cells. You have to inject genetic program codes into our cells so that they create something strange in us that our immune system should then defend against. Our immune system is to be trained and sensitized to possible pathogens against the previously programmed material characteristics. So the ideology.
But what happens when these changed cells are recognized and destroyed by our immune cells like an infection? What happens if cells are changed unplanned in important organs, for example in the liver, and these are then severely damaged by a strong cellular defense reaction? What happens if this happens in many places in the body and a dangerous cytokine storm is triggered?
- Which cells are ultimately controlled and changed by the shuttle viruses or nano-particles?
- How precise and tissue or cell specific is the shuttle process?
- Does our cellular defense recognize the modified cells as foreign and destroy them, as it does with the cells infected by viruses, for example?
- How does our immune system differentiate between infected and modified cells in the event of infection?
- Does this process trigger a self-limiting reaction, or can mass cell death (apoptosis) with cytokine storm and shock reactions be triggered?
- How long must the effects of such manipulation be followed up in order to rule out autoimmune reactions or tumor induction?
- How thoroughly have such serious risks been investigated through extensive animal testing?
- Why is there a very limited and strict indication for gene therapeutics, whereas an "accelerated procedure" is permitted for the genetic modifications examined to prevent infection?
Conventional "pandemic" vaccines also bring increased risks
Regardless of the genetically modulating methods, several classic vaccines are also being tested. In these, different inactivated virus components are supplied from the outside, which should lead directly to the formation of antibodies. Some of the candidates also contain potentiators or adjuvants.
With these vaccines, too, risks are to be accepted due to the alleged time pressure, which can arise, for example, from contamination by proteins from the nutrient cells of bioreactors. In the shadow of scaremongering, companies are granted a much too short observation period. Protein residues from bioreactor cells can very well occur as contaminants in vaccine batches and cause cellular reactions or even cancer-like growth. Long-term observation times are required to rule this out.
The addition of potentiators (adjuvants) is intended to increase the immunizing effect of the antigens. However, it is non-specific and can trigger severe autoimmune diseases, as have also been observed with swine flu vaccines.
Flu shot - the annual business with hope
Braking irresponsible hazards and taking liability!
So if you want to sell us such a corona “vaccination”, you may know something about molecular biology, or about business, but look away when it comes to health.
And if you want to convince us that you have to suppress our freedoms until there is a vaccination, you are probably a specialist in suppression but not in prevention.
In any case, it is already completely irresponsible for the responsible governments to release the vaccine industry from liability. This invites the neglect of the precautionary principle, which is so often invoked, and makes the vaccine industry a responsible zone, in which speculators and virological hazard watchers are already bustling.
It is gross abuse of entrusted power if ethics committees or the heads of state control authorities obey everything obediently, while Ms. Merkel or Ms. van der Leyen let the vaccine industry gamblers, some of whom have been convicted, with billions of euros in support of the population out of political calculation.
The fish stinks from the head
Highly qualified scientists work at the RKI, the PEI, the BfArM or the EMA, who have to watch and keep silent, because otherwise they are threatened existentially, as can be seen from the whistleblower from the Ministry of the Interior.
Yes, it is the corruption of science by politics and business! We are experiencing a time of institutional corruption, an anonymous corruption that frightens fear, that is more dangerous than any virus and that has robbed many people of their livelihood in recent months and has also cost many people their lives.
10 demands with regard to measures of drug infection prophylaxis:
Regardless of the genetically modulating methods, several classic vaccines are also being tested. In these, different inactivated virus components are supplied from the outside, which should lead directly to the formation of antibodies. Some of the candidates also contain potentiators or adjuvants.
With these vaccines, too, risks are to be accepted due to the alleged time pressure, which can arise, for example, from contamination by proteins from the nutrient cells of bioreactors. In the shadow of scaremongering, companies are granted a much too short observation period. Protein residues from bioreactor cells can very well occur as contaminants in vaccine batches and cause cellular reactions or even cancer-like growth. Long-term observation times are required to rule this out.
The addition of potentiators (adjuvants) is intended to increase the immunizing effect of the antigens. However, it is non-specific and can trigger severe autoimmune diseases, as have also been observed with swine flu vaccines.
In addition, for all methods it remains questionable whether induced immunization leads to a protective effect in the case of the corona viruses which are recombining again and again. This can only be assessed after a flu season / corona season.
So the flu / corona vaccination remains an annual good deal with hope, because in this "business" something can only be said retrospectively about the benefits.
In addition, there is now enough experience that the space occupied by vaccines suppressed viruses by other (more dangerous?) pathogens. Because even an influenza vaccination does not prevent respiratory diseases, it only changes the spectrum of pathogens! That would be no different with a corona component or the planned genetic manipulations.
So if you want to sell us such a corona “vaccination”, you may know something about molecular biology, or about business, but look away when it comes to health.
And if you want to convince us that you have to suppress our freedoms until there is a vaccination, you are probably a specialist in suppression but not in prevention.
In any case, it is already completely irresponsible for the responsible governments to release the vaccine industry from liability. This invites the neglect of the precautionary principle, which is so often invoked, and makes the vaccine industry a responsible zone, in which speculators and virological hazard watchers are already bustling.
Highly qualified scientists work at the RKI, the PEI, the BfArM or the EMA, who have to watch and keep silent, because otherwise they are threatened existentially, as can be seen from the whistleblower from the Ministry of the Interior.
Yes, it is the corruption of science by politics and business! We are experiencing a time of institutional corruption, an anonymous corruption that frightens fear, that is more dangerous than any virus and that has robbed many people of their livelihood in recent months and has also cost many people their lives.
- Immediate stop of clinical studies with recombinant RNA or DNA in humans
- Immediate stop of lockdown measures regardless of possible vaccines.
- No blackmail due to proof of immunity
- Maximum patient data protection also with regard to the immune status
- No acceptance guarantees or exemptions from liability for biotechnological companies, the pharmaceutical industry or cooperating service providers
- No potentiators or risky adjuvants in vaccines
- No trade secrets in vaccine manufacturing
- 100% transparency of all documents and results in connection with clinical studies for vaccines
- 100% transparency of all documents of clinical studies for the prevention and treatment of diseases, which are regulated in the IFSG
- Complete transparency and inspection of files in the protocols and documents of ethics committees in clinical studies on drug or immunological infection prophylaxis or vaccine testing
Hints:
(1) Genetic Engineering Act: Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) A GMO is an organism, with the exception of humans, whose genetic material has been modified in a way that does not occur under natural conditions through crossing or natural recombination.
(2) EU Directive 2009/120, 2.1 Gene therapy : A gene therapy is a biological medicine that has the following characteristics:
a) It contains an active ingredient that contains or consists of a recombinant nucleic acid that is used or administered in humans to regulate, repair, replace, add or remove a nucleic acid sequence.
b) Its therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic effect is directly related to the recombinant nucleic acid sequence which it contains, or to the product which results from the expression of this sequence.
Infectious disease vaccines are not gene therapy drugs.
(3) See my report on GMOs for the Council of Europe
(4) With the RNA A lot of data on the security profile is still missing. In addition to local or systemic immune reactions that are similar to those of conventional vaccinations, it should be observed how the expressed immunogens, i.e. the antigens that trigger the immune response, are distributed in the body and whether they may persist. It is also unclear whether the modified, non-native nucleotides have toxic effects. A small inaccuracy of the RNA vaccine can lead to the fact that the “vaccination” leads to the triggering of the disease or greatly increases it. All of this has not been sufficiently researched. It should also be borne in mind that, depending on the route of application, RNA is introduced into the extracellular space. Extracellular RNA is known to promote coagulation and tissue permeability. (Source: Stefan Hockertz)
(5) For DNA vaccines , the DNA sequence of the desired antigen is inserted into a bacterial plasmid. The plasmid is taken up and read in the target cell after injection of the vaccine; the foreign antigen is to be produced there. Some DNA vaccines get to the target cell by electroporation. Short electrical impulses at the moment of intramuscular vaccination ensure that the cell membranes become permeable to the foreign DNA. DNA vaccines typically require strong adjuvants to trigger an effective immune response. So far, DNA vaccines have only been approved in veterinary medicine. A conceivable disadvantage is the accidental integration of plasmid DNA into the genome of the host: the integration could induce an increased tumor formation due to activation of oncogenes or deactivation of tumor suppressor genes, or cause autoimmune diseases (e.g. lupus erythematosus). (Source: Stefan Hockertz)
(6) The questions raised in the text are answered by the immunologist Prof. Stefan Hockertz as follows:
- Which cells are ultimately controlled and changed by the shuttle viruses or nano-particles? UNKNOWN
- How precise and tissue or cell specific is the shuttle process? NOT AT ALL. LIPOSOMES TRIED FOR DECADES AND FAILED
- Does our cellular defense recognize the modified cells as foreign and destroy them, as it does with the cells infected by viruses, for example? THE DANGER IS GREAT.
- How does our immune system differentiate between infected and modified cells in the event of infection? NOT AT THE MOST, THE INFECTION CAN BE MAKE UP.
- Does this process trigger a self-limiting reaction, or can mass cell death (apoptosis) with cytokine storm and shock reactions be triggered? THESE ARE RESEARCH APPROACHES WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
- How long must the effects of such manipulation be followed up in order to rule out autoimmune reactions or tumor induction? AT LEAST 2 YEARS
- How thoroughly have such serious risks been investigated through extensive animal testing? ALSO 2 YEARS AT LEAST, especially if there were farm animals.
- Why is there a very limited and strict indication for gene therapeutics, whereas an "accelerated procedure" is permitted for the genetic modifications examined to prevent infection? THIS IS PURE POLICY AND DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING REGULATORY POINTS.
